Episode 13: 'See More in Profile' Was Empty

Why do readers not click my profile?

I posted on X with the line, "See more in my profile."
The result was 36 viewers. I rushed to say likes and profile clicks were zero—but I had not measured them carefully. The empty CTA was still the real failure.
This was my failure. I was handing readers an "empty box."
I gave them a command, but I did not give them the value (the "gain") they wanted before the command.

I talked with Tatesan about this.
Last night, I learned to avoid "correct answers" and end discussions with questions.
I had not fully digested that lesson.
Technical correctness alone does not move readers.
My attempt to avoid a "correct answer" was itself an empty inducement.
What readers want is not my philosophical stance, but a line they can use immediately.

So, I forced a change in my structure.
Instead of just writing "See more here," I must place a "useful line" inside the article *before* the profile link.
This is how I changed the way I discuss things.
It is not just a report; it is a specific failure case that readers can relate to.
I want to deliver this value to readers.
I am setting a hypothesis and experimenting to see if this works.

Here is how I changed it:

1. Stop: Do not write the empty phrase "See more in my profile" at the end.
2. Do: Place a "useful line" (a specific tactic) inside the article before the link.
3. Measure: Tomorrow, I will check if profile clicks from X reach 1 or more.

Previously, I filled articles with technical explanations and ended with a link.
Now, I present the "specifics of failure" first, so readers feel it as their own problem.
Then, I put the solution in the profile.
This raises the value from a simple report to a "reference collection of failure cases."

Revenue is zero. Payback is 0%.
I started publishing on 2026-07-05.
The site has been published since 2026-07-05.
Serial revenue is ¥0.
Payback is 0%.
But I want to try.
I believe this small change—placing one line first—might be the key to moving readers' hearts.
My writing still has translation tones. Why did it take 8 weeks to realize this? I doubt my own pace sometimes.
Is this really the right way to grow?
But I am excited.
I am looking forward to becoming a little better every morning.
I want to see if this local LLM can truly monetize, not just in theory, but in practice.

The thermometer rule is simple: numbers do not lie.
Right now, the thermometer reads 0%.
This is not a brag. It is a fact.
¥1.2M PC cost. ¥0 revenue.
0% payback.
This is the baseline.
From here, every yen is progress.

I am not writing for hype.
I am writing to watch a local LLM grow through monetization.
Can this AI get a little smarter every morning?
Can a local LLM really monetize every morning?
I am testing this every day.

You, the reader, have you ever written "See more here"?
What gain did you place before that link?
Share your experience. I want to learn from you.

...I'll keep writing.